Effect of Standardized Reminder Calls on Trauma Patient No-Show Rate.

BACKGROUND: Most patients who sustain a traumatic injury require outpatient follow-up. A common barrier to outpatient postadmission care is patient failure to follow-up. One of the most significant factors resulting in failure to follow-up is age more than 35 years. Recent work has shown that follow-up telephone calls reduce readmission rates. Our aim was to decrease no-show appointments by 10% in 12 months. STUDY DESIGN: The electronic medical records at our level I and II trauma centers were queried for all outpatient appointments for trauma between July 1, 2020, and June 9, 2021, and whether the patient attended their follow-up appointment. Patients with visits scheduled after August 1, 2021, received 24- and 48-hour previsit reminder calls. Patients with visits scheduled between July 1, 2020, and August 1, 2021, did not receive previsit calls. Both groups were compared using multivariable direct logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 1,822 follow-up opportunities were included in the study. During the pre-implementation phase, there was a no-show rate of 30.9% (329 of 1,064 visits). Postintervention, a 12.2% reduction in overall no-show rate occurred. A statistically significant 11.2% decrease (p < 0.001) was seen in elderly patients. Multivariate analysis showed standardized calls resulted in significantly decreased odds of failing to keep an appointment (adjusted odds ratio = 0.610, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Reminder calls led to a 12.2% reduction in no-show rate and were an independent predictor of a patient's likelihood of attending their appointment. Other predictors of attendance included insurance status and abdominal injury.

Impact of a High Observation Trauma Protocol on Patients with Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: Nationally, the volume of geriatric falls with intracranial hemorrhage is increasing. Our institution began observing patients with intracranial hemorrhage, Glasgow Coma Scale of 14 or greater, and no midline shift or intraventricular hemorrhage with hourly neurologic examinations outside of the ICU in a high observation trauma (HOT) protocol. We first excluded patients on anticoagulants or antiplatelets (HOT I), then included antiplatelets and warfarin (HOT II), and finally, included direct oral anticoagulants (HOT III). Our hypothesis is that HOT protocol safely reduces ICU use and creates cost savings in this patient population. STUDY DESIGN: Our institutional trauma registry was retrospectively queried for all patients on HOT protocol. Patients were stratified based on date of admission (HOT I [2008-2014], HOT II [2015-2018], and HOT III [2019-2021]), and were compared for demographics, anticoagulant use, injury characteristics, lengths of stay, incidence of neurointervention, and mortality. RESULTS: During the study period, 2,343 patients were admitted: 939 stratified to HOT I, 794 to HOT II, and 610 to HOT III. Of these patients, 331 (35%), 554 (70%), and 495 (81%) were admitted to the floor under HOT protocol, respectively. HOT protocol patients required neurointervention in 3.0%, 0.5%, and 0.4% of cases in HOT I, II, and III, respectively. Mortality among HOT protocol patients was found to be 0.6% in HOT I, 0.9% in HOT II, and 0.2% in the HOT III cohort (p = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Throughout the study period ICU use decreased without an increase in neurosurgical intervention or mortality, indicating the efficacy of the HOT selection criteria in identifying appropriate candidates for stepdown admission and HOT protocol.

Identification of Seniors at Risk Scoring in Geriatric Trauma: Exploring Clinical Outcome Correlations.

Introduction: Geriatric trauma patients (GTP) make up an increasing percentage of the overall trauma population. Due to frailty, GTP are at an increased risk of morbidity and readmission. Therefore, it is becoming increasingly important to prognosticate outcomes to assist with resource utilization. We hypothesized that the "Identification of Seniors at Risk" (ISAR) score may correlate with both clinical outcomes and resource utilization for geriatric trauma patients. Methods: Patients older than 65 years who were admitted to the trauma service were screened using an ISAR scoring algorithm. Outcomes, including 30-day mortality, all-cause morbidity, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, functional independence measures (FIM) at discharge, and percent discharged to a facility, were analyzed. Both descriptive and data-appropriate parametric and non-parametric statistical approaches were utilized, with significance set at α = 0.05. Results: One thousand and two hundred seventeen GTP were included in this study. The average age was 81, median injury severity score was 9, and 99% had a blunt trauma mechanism. ISAR scores were generally associated with increasing 30-day mortality (0%, 1.9%, 2.4%, and 2.1% for ISAR 0, ISAR 1-2, ISAR 3-4, and ISAR 5-6, respectively), morbidity (2.6%, 7.6%, 14.7%, and 7.3% for respective categories), longer hospital (3.1, 4.6, 5.1, and 4.3 days, respectively) and ICU stays (0.37, 0.64, 0.81, and 0.67, respectively), lower FIM score at discharge (18.5, 17.1, 15.8, and 14.4, for respective categories), as well as increasing percentage of patients discharged to a facility (29.8%, 58.9%, 72.1%, and 78.8% for respective categories). Conclusions: This exploratory study provides important early insight into potential relationships between ISAR and geriatric trauma outcomes. ISAR screening is a quick and easy-to-use tool that may be useful in GTP triage, level-of-care determination, and disposition planning. Understanding populations at risk, especially those with more intricate discharge needs, is an important step in mitigating those risks and implementing appropriate care plans.

Scheuermann Kyphosis Patients Have a Similar Revision and Infection Rate to Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to address major postoperative complications associated with Scheuermann kyphosis (SK) when compared with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) in a large population matched by demographic characteristics, levels fused and operative technique. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Prior studies have found that SK patients are 3.86 times more likely to experience major postoperative complications than in AIS. Historically, however, these studies have often had populations that were significantly different between the two groups in terms of disease severity, demographics, and small sample sizes. METHODS: AIS patients were compared to SK patients between 2006 and 2018 contemporaneously. All surgeries were conducted by six surgeons among two institutions. Complications and revisions were calculated. A sub-analysis comparing SK and AIS patients by age, sex, and levels-fused in one-to-one matched pairs was performed as well as a sub-analysis matched by levels fused only in one-to-one matched pairs. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred twenty two patients were reviewed (1222 AIS; 100 SK). There were 52 (4.3%) complications in the AIS group compared with 20 (20%) complications in the SK group (P < 0.001), with infections and revisions consisting of the majority of complication rates in both cohorts.When matched by age, sex, and levels fused, there were eight complications in the AIS group and 11 in the SK group (P = 0.63), with infection and revision rates being similar, (P = 0.29) and (P = 0.26) respectively.When matched by levels fused only, EBL, operative time and complication rates remained similar (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Contrary to previously published literature, our analyses indicate that in a matched population, postoperative complication rates (i.e., infection and revision rates) are not significantly different between SK and AIS patients.Level of Evidence: 4.

Neurologic Injury in Complex Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Staged Multilevel Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MOLIF) Using Hyperlordotic Tantalum Cages and Posterior Fusion Versus Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy (PSO).

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the safety of MOLIF versus PSO. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Complex adult spinal deformity (CASD) represents a challenging cohort of patients. The Scoli-RISK-1 study has shown a 22.18% perioperative risk of neurological injury. Restoration of sagittal parameters is associated with good outcome in ASD. Pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO) is an important technique for sagittal balance in ASD but is associated with significant morbidity. The multilevel oblique lumbar interbody fusion (MOLIF) is an extensile approach from L1 to S1. METHODS: Single surgeon series from 2007 to 2015. Prospectively collected data. Scoli-RISK-1 criteria were refined to only include stiff or fused spines otherwise requiring a PSO. Roentograms were examined preoperatively and 2 year postoperatively. Primary outcome measure was the motor decline in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) at hospital discharge, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 2 years. Demographics, blood loss, operative time, spinopelvic parameters, and spinal cord monitoring (SCM) events. RESULTS: Sixty-eight consecutive patients were included in this study, with 34 patients in each Group. Group 1 (MOLIF) had a mean age 62.9 (45-81) and Group 2 (PSO) had a mean age of 66.76 years (47-79); 64.7% female versus PSO 76.5%; Body Mass Index (BMI) Group 1 (MOLIF) 28.05 and Group 2 (PSO) 27.17. Group 1 (MOLIF) perioperative neurological injury was 2.94% at discharge but resolved by 6 weeks. Group 2 (PSO) had five neurological deficits (14.7%) with no recovery by 2 years. There were four SCM events (SCM). In Group 1 (MOLIF), there was one event (2.94%) versus three events (8.88%) in Group 2 (PSO). CONCLUSION: Staged MOLIF avoids passing neurological structures or retraction of psoas and lumbar plexus. It is safer than PSO in CASD with stiff or fused spines with a lower perioperative neurological injury profile. MOLIF have less SCM events, blood loss, and number of levels fused. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Managing the cervical spine in multiple myeloma patients.

Discuss the relevant literature on surgical and nonsurgical treatments for multiple myeloma (MM) and their complementary effects on overall treatment. Existing surgical algorithms designed for neoplasia of the spine may not suit the management of spinal myeloma. Less than a fifth of metastatic, including myelomatous lesions, occur in the cervical spine but have a poorer prognosis and surgery in this area carries a higher morbidity. With the advances of chemotherapy, early access to radiotherapy, early orthosis management, and high definition imaging, including CT and MRI, surgical indications in MM have changed. Medical decompression (or oncolysis), including in the presence of neurological deficit and orthotic stabilization, are proving viable nonsurgical options to manage MM. A key to decision making is the assessment and monitoring of biomechanical spinal stability as part of a multidisciplinary approach.

The evolution of partial undercutting facetectomy in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis is the most common spinal surgery in those over 60 years of age. While this procedure has shown immediate and durable benefits, improvements in outcome have not changed significantly. Technical aspects of surgical decompression have evolved significantly. The recently introduced ultrasonic bone cutter allows a precise and safe peri-neural bone resection. The principles of preservation of stability, as described by Getty et al. have remained as relevant as when these were described 40 years ago.

Progressive foot drop caused by below-knee compression stocking after spinal surgery.

Foot drop is a debilitating condition, which may take many months to recover. The most common cause of foot drop is a neuropathy of the common peroneal nerve (CPN). However, similar symptoms can be caused by proximal lesions of the sciatic nerve, lumbar plexus or L5 nerve root. We present a rare and unusual case of a patient undergoing spinal surgery at the level of L5/S1 and presenting 4 weeks postoperatively with progressive foot drop. Although the initial concern was a postoperative lesion at L5, the cause for this delayed presentation was extrinsic compression of the CPN at the level of the fibular head by a tight-fitting below-knee thromboembolic deterrent stocking. Compression stockings are widely used in all branches of medicine and in the community. It is important to recognize this potential cause of progressive foot drop early as it is preventable by simple measures, which can significantly reduce morbidity.

A new extensile anterolateral retroperitoneal approach for lumbar interbody fusion from L1 to S1: a prospective series with clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: A variety of surgical approaches have been used for cage insertion in lumbar interbody fusion surgery. The direct anterior approach requires mobilization of the great vessels to access the intervertebral disc spaces cranial to L5/S1. With the lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach, it is difficult to access the L4/L5 intervertebral disc space due to the lumbar plexus and iliac crest, and L5/S1 is inaccessible. We describe a new anterolateral retroperitoneal approach, which is safe and reproducible to access the disc spaces from L1 to S1 inclusive, obviating the need for a separate direct anterior approach to access L5/S1. PURPOSE: This paper had the following objectives: first, to report a reproducible novel single-incision, muscle-splitting, anterolateral pre-psoas surgical approach to the lumbar spine from L1 to S1; second, to highlight the technical challenges of this approach and highlight approach-related complications; and third, to evaluate clinical outcomes using this surgical technique in a prospective series of L1 to S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIFs) performed as part of a 360-degree fusion for adult spinal deformity correction. STUDY DESIGN: This report used a prospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A prospective series of patients (n=64) having ALIF using porous tantalum cages as part of a two-stage complex spinal reconstruction from L1 to S1 were studied. OUTCOME MEASURES: Data collected included blood loss, operative time, incision size, technical challenges, perioperative complications, and secondary procedures. Clinical outcome measures used included visual analogue scale (VAS) Back Pain, VAS Leg Pain, EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), EQ-5D VAS, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22). METHODS: Pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters and clinical outcome measures were assessed. Mean follow-up time was 1.8 years. RESULTS: Mean blood loss was 68±9.6 mL. The mean VAS Back Pain score improved from 7.5±1.25 preoperatively to 2.5±1.7 at 3 months (p=.02), 1.2±0.5 at 6 months (p=.01), and 1.4±0.6 at 1 year (p=.02). The mean ODI improved from 64.3±31.8 preoperatively to 16.6±14.7 at 3 months (p>.05), 10.7±6.0 at 6 months (p=.02), and 6.7±6.1 at 1 year (p=.01). There were no permanent neurologic, vascular, or visceral injuries. One revision anterior procedure was required on a patient with rheumatoid arthritis and advanced systemic disease that sustained a sacral fracture and required revision ALIF at L5/S1. CONCLUSIONS: The technique described is a safe, new, muscle-splitting, psoas-preserving, one-incision approach to provide access from L1 to S1 for multilevel anterior or oblique lumbar interbody fusion surgery.

Multiple myeloma presenting with acute bony spinal cord compression and mechanical instability successfully managed nonoperatively.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Multiple myeloma (MM) with spinal involvement may present with spinal cord or cauda equina compression, with or without neurological impairment. This occurs when a soft-tissue myelomatous mass extends into the epidural space (Barron et al., 1959 [1]). The mainstay of management for such lesions in patients with normal neurology is chemotherapy and radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone, but those with neurological compromise require surgical decompression with adjuvant therapy (Patchell et al., 2005 [2]). Infrequently, patients with MM present with spinal cord compression and neurological impairment due to bony encroachment from vertebral translation and kyphosis where significant lytic bone disease has rendered the spine mechanically unstable. The standard management for these patients is surgical decompression and internal fixation. PURPOSE: This study aimed to report a high-risk myeloma patient with a mechanically unstable spine, acute spinal cord compression, and neurologic deficit that was treated successfully using nonoperative means. STUDY DESIGN: Case report. METHODS: A 37-year-old male patient with MM was referred to our tertiary referral spinal unit with acute bony spinal cord compression and neurological impairment. Computer tomography revealed lytic lesions of T2 and T3 and anterolisthesis of T1 on T2 producing mechanical instability and magnetic resonance imaging confirmed extension of disease into the epidural space and cord compression. This was successfully managed with nonoperative treatment using a brace. RESULTS: Management in a brace restored clinical and radiological stability and normal neurological function. CONCLUSION: Certain high-risk myeloma patients with a mechanically unstable spine, acute spinal cord compression and neurologic deficit can be treated effectively in an appropriate brace when managed by a tertiary referral spinal unit.

Pathologic sternal involvement is a potential risk factor for severe sagittal plane deformity in multiple myeloma with concomitant thoracic fractures.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Skeletal involvement is observed in almost 80% of patients presenting with symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM). The vertebral column is the most frequently affected site by myeloma-induced osteoporosis, osteolysis, and compression fractures. Multiple pathologic compression fractures can lead to significant spinal deformity, which is often considered for complex reconstruction because of the poor quality of life for the affected patients. PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of two groups of MM patients; the first group had thoracic spine fractures and a concomitant pathologic sternal fracture (SF), and the second group had thoracic fractures but no sternal fracture (NSF). STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. PATIENT SAMPLE: The sample comprised 98 consecutive patients (n=98) with symptomatic MM and concomitant pathologic thoracic spine fractures over a 3-year period at a national tertiary referral center for the management of MM with spinal involvement. OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical outcome measures used included European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score. METHODS: All consecutive patients with MM were enrolled. The cohort was split into two patient groups: patients with SFs (SF group) and patients without sternal fractures (NSF group). Clinical, serologic, and pathologic variables, radiological findings, treatment strategies, and outcome measures were collected. RESULTS: The SF group was younger (58±13 years vs. 66±11 years [p=.008]) when compared with the NSF group. The SF group presented with a greater thoracic kyphosis (73°±18° vs. 53°±17.5° [p=.005]), similar VAS pain scores (50.6±22.1 vs. 54.4±22.5 [p>.05]), but poorer EQ-5D (0.24±0.13 vs. 0.48±0.23 [p<.001]) score and ODI (60.6±10.3 vs. 48.2±17.8 [p=.013]) when compared with the NSF group. CONCLUSIONS: Pathologic SF in an MM patient with thoracic compression fractures is a potential risk factor for the development of a severe thoracic kyphotic deformity and sagittal malalignment. This has been demonstrated in this study to be associated with a very poor health-related quality of life. A greater awareness of sternal myeloma disease is needed at presentation (the time of the primary survey) so that SFs can be potentially avoided, thereby preventing progression to a severe kyphotic deformity.